The U.S.
business press can be revealing sometimes and the current issue of Fortune is about Christie with an
article headed: “Chris Christie: Can Corporate America’s Candidate Get Out of
This Jam?”
The “Chamber of Commerce wing of the GOP had singled out Christie—a pro-business, pro-Wall Street, tough-on-unions blue-stater—as its best hope for a friend in the White House after eight years in the wilderness,” reports the piece written by Tory Newmyer.
The “Chamber of Commerce wing of the GOP had singled out Christie—a pro-business, pro-Wall Street, tough-on-unions blue-stater—as its best hope for a friend in the White House after eight years in the wilderness,” reports the piece written by Tory Newmyer.
“Until this
crucible” known as “Bridgegate,” Christie “had been the beneficiary of a
national press corps that celebrated his straight talk shtick...That treatment
helped inflate his profile well beyond his home state...”
Will the scandal
sink Christie’s pursuit of becoming president of the U.S.? Not for one Christie
backer cited in the piece, Dan Lufkin, “co-founder of storied Wall Street firm Donaldson,
Lufkin & Jenrette,” who praises “Christie’s response to the bridge mess.”
Lufkin is quoted as saying: “He took quick drastic action...It’s another
demonstration of his straightforwardness.” The piece also acknowledges: “When
the fuller story of the traffic troubles is revealed, however, that Christie
image could wobble badly enough to collapse; his advantage is that he may have
time to repair the damage. If he can’t, conversations with party wise men and
Wall Street donors suggest a troubling fact for the Garden Stater:
Establishment esteem for him runs wide but not particularly deep.”
The Christie explosion
isn’t unexpected. “He was a ticking time bomb as a politician. It was only a
matter of time before he blew up,” wrote Michael Cohen in the British newspaper
The Guardian after Bridgegate began
unfolding.
In 2012 Mitt
Romney realized the deep downsides of Christie when he searched for a vice
presidential running mate and found Christie lacking, according to the book Double Down. Among negative things found by the Romney camp
in vetting Christie, says the book, were his free-spending habits as a U.S.
attorney, problematic clients when he was a lobbyist and a lawsuit for
defamation he settled with an apology. These and other matters constituted “a
host of potential red flags pertaining to his record,” reported The Washington Post in an article in November
headlined: “What Mitt Romney learned about Chris Christie in 2012 and why it
matters for 2016.”
Of Bridgegate, “What’s so damaging to Christie about these revelations is
that they expose him and his brain trust as breathtakingly venal and
vindictive,” stated Joshua Green on Bloomberg Businessweek.
New Jersey native, writer and humorist
Marvin Kitman, in his online “The
Christie Chronicles,” has been writing about “The Decline and Fall of the
Christie Empire.” In the
installment “Who’s Afraid of the Big Bad Christie?” Kitman tells how his
“progressive friends” have been watching excerpts from the marathon 108-minute Christie
press conference “expecting that every time the governor denied knowing
anything about the GWB [George Washington Bridge] lane closures, his nose would
grow longer, the so-called
Pinocchio Effect in jurisprudence.” Those claims of no knowledge are now unraveling. Kitman
predicts that: “Is the governor guilty will be a regular feature on TV news,
like the weather and sports, until 2016.” Earlier, in 2011, the sage Kitman
declared: “I want Governor Chris Christie to run for president. It’s the best
way to get him out of the state.”
Chris Christie will hopefully go
down as a hot-tempered, hyper-ambitious politician inflated in importance by a
good chunk of U.S. media delighted to promote “Corporate America’s Candidate”
for president. Hopefully, the nasty, ethically-challenged
Christie will fade—before doing some huge national, indeed international, damage.
No comments:
Post a Comment