Pollard had been
project manager at Indian Point for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC) from which he resigned at that time charging the NRC “suppresses the
existence of unresolved safety questions and fails to resolve these problems.”
He joined the Union of Concerned Scientists.
An explosion and
fire at a transformer at Indian Point 3 on Saturday is but one of the many
accidents that have occurred at the Indian Point facility through the
years—none catastrophic as have been the disasters at the Three Mile Island,
Chernobyl and the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plants.
But Indian Point
2 has been in operation for 41 years, although when nuclear power was first advanced
in the United States, plants were never seen as running for more than 40 years
because of radioactivity embrittling metal parts and otherwise causing safety
problems. So licenses were limited to 40 years.
Indian Point 2 is
thus now running without an operating license while the NRC considers an
application before it from the plant’s owner, Entergy, to allow it to run another
20 years—for 60 years.
Indian Point 3,
where the transformer explosion and fire occurred, has been operational for 39
years and its license expires this year. (Indian Point l was shut down early
because of mechanical deficiencies.) Entergy also is seeking to have Indian
Point 3’s operating license extended to 60 years.
These old, long
problem-plagued nuclear plants, 26 miles up the Hudson River from New York City,
are now disasters waiting to happen in a very heavily populated area. Some 22
million people live within 50 miles of the Indian Point site.
“This plant is the nuclear plant that is closest to the most densely
populated area on the globe,” declared New York
Governor Andrew Cuomo at the Indian Point site on Sunday. Cuomo, who has been
pushing to have the Indian Point nuclear plants closed, noted that this was
“not the first transformer fire” at them. And the concern is that “one
situation is going to trigger another.”
Entergy PR
people in recent days have stressed that the transformer explosion and fire
occurred in the “non-nuclear part” of Indian Point 3. However, as Pollard noted
in a television documentary, “Three Mile Island Revisited,” that I wrote and
narrated on that accident, “there is no non-nuclear part of a nuclear plant.”
What could be
the extent of a major accident at Indian Point?
The Nuclear
Regulatory Commission in 1982 issued a report titled “Calculation of Reactor
Accident Consequences” or CRAC-2. The research for the report was done at the
U.S. Department of Energy’s Sandia National Laboratories in New Mexico.
CRAC-2—you can read the full report online at http://www.ccnr.org/crac.html--
—projects that in the event of a
loss-of-coolant accident with breach of containment at Indian Point 2, there
could be 46,000 “peak early fatalities,” 141,000 “peak early injuries,” 13,000
“cancer deaths” and a cost in property damages (in 1980 dollars) of $274 billion (which in today’s dollars would
be $1 trillion)
For
an accident at Indian Point 3 in which the transformer explosion and fire
happened, because it is a somewhat bigger reactor (generating 1,025 megawatts
compared to Indian Point 2’s 1,020) the impacts would be greater, said CRAC-2
For Indian Point
3, in the event of a meltdown with breach of containment, CRAC-2 estimates
50,000 “peak early fatalities,” 167,000
“peak early injuries,” 14,000 “cancer deaths” and a cost in property
damage at $314 billion.
Compounding the
problem of the Indian Point plants being old—consider driving a 60 year-old car
on a high-speed Interstate—they are at the intersection of the Ramapo and Stamford
earthquake faults. As a 2008 study by seismologists at Columbia University’s
Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory found: “Indian Point is situated at the
intersection of the two most striking linear features marking the seismicity
and also in the midst of a large population that is at risk in case of an
accident. This is clearly one of the least favorable sites in our study area
from an earthquake hazard and risk perspective.”
“This aging
dilapidated facility has endless problems leaking radioactive chemicals, oil
and PCB’s into the Hudson River. It’s unconscionable to permit the continued
operation of Indian Point,” said Susan Hito-Shapiro, an environmental attorney
and member of the leadership council of the Indian point Safe Energy Coalition.
Further, she
pointed out this week, Indian Point has been described as “the most attractive
terrorist target” in the U.S. because of its proximity to New York City and it
also being seven miles from the U.S. Military Academy at West Point. Indeed,
there was consideration by the 9/11 terrorists of crashing into Indian Point. Both
captured jets flew over the Indian Point nuclear station before striking the
World Trade Center minutes later.
And she
described it as “outrageous” that the Federal Emergency Management Agency has
approved an evacuation plan for Indian Point “although it would never work” in
the event of an major accident at the plants considering the millions of people
who stand to be affected.
The key to New
York State’s strategy to shut down Indian Point is the denial by the state’s
Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) to give Entergy a “water use
permit” to let it continue to send many hundreds of millions of gallons of
water a day from the nuclear plants into the Hudson River.
“We need to make
sure DEC stays strong,” says Hito-Shapiro.
In light of the
historic, reckless, scandalous weakness of the federal government when it comes
to Indian Point—and the nuclear power plants of other utilities—strong state
action is most necessary.
